Alright, now on to the actual blog. This week in class we have been discussing the book Heart of Darkness and one of the main topics brought up was the idea of restraint. It seemed to me, that the majority of the class was of the state of mind that while the African people were considered savage by the Europeans, it was really the Africans who demonstrated a restraint typically associated with a western lifestyle and the so called civilized Europeans were the ones who acted savagely. It seemed like they highly praised African society and just completely bashed on the Europeans. While I agree with them that the Europeans did in fact act with an unnecessary ferocity, it does not mean that we should write of their life style completely. Neither society is perfect and they both have their faults, simply the societies are just different. Furthermore, the people in both societies show restraint, just in different ways. There are so many things that European people had to deal with that the Africans didn't, and vice versa. The Europeans didn't have to hunt through the jungle in search of game, but the Africans didn't have to labor in factories or struggle with an incredibly strict and oppressive social structure. Both societies we're a challenge to live through and you can't really say one was better than the other because they both had their challenges, and their rewards.
One of the biggest themes in the book is savagery vs. society and how those two are interwoven. Heart of Darkness, in my opinion, does an incredible job of clearly showing your conscious the weaknesses of both societies, while simultaneously allowing your subconscious to realize their strengths. It enables you to draw your own opinion of the savagery and restraint both societies display, and therefor deepens your understanding of society at large, and what it means to be "civilized".
